Effectiveness of Restitution Implementation through Consignation (Case Study: Wates, Sleman, and Karanganyar District Courts)

Maria Prehatiningsih Utami

Abstract


The implementation of restitution can be carried out by the defendant through the prosecutor or by the defendant through the prosecutor by involving the LPSK. Based on various mechanisms, in fact it is unable to guarantee payment of restitution by the perpetrators. Facing this phenomenon, the prosecutor approached the perpetrator so that the restitution was paid. Based on this approach, the defendant can pay restitution during the trial process. The restitution money is consigned and handed over to the victim after the decision is final and binding. After being analyzed using the legal effectiveness theory of Donald Black and Anthony Allot, it was found that restitution consignments made prior to prosecution were effective. However, there is no technical uniformity in the implementation of the restitution consignment. Moreover, its implementation is also influenced by social factors. Based on the analysis with the theory of the legal system, it was found that there were obstacles in the aspects of legal structure, legal substance and legal culture. This research is a sociological legal research with a qualitative research type. The primary data of this research are the results of interviews conducted with informants who handle restitution cases at the Karanganyar District Court, Wates District Court and Sleman District Court. Secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials are obtained through literature studies. Further research data are presented in the form of narrative descriptions with inductive thinking logic. This research provides recommendations for the formation of regulations regarding the technicalities of restitution consignment including institutions that receive deposits, the amount of payment, the time of deposit and the time of submission of restitution money.
Keywords: consignment;; effectiveness; restitution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, Mahrus, and Ari Wibowo. “Kompensasi Dan Restitusi Yang Berorientasi Pada Korban Tindak Pidana.” Yuridika 33, no. 2 (2018): 260.

Allott, Anthony. “The Effectiveness of Laws.” Valparaiso University Law Review 15, no. 2 (1981).

Angkasa. Viktimologi. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2020.

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi. “KBBI Daring: Konsinyasi,” 2022.

Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. “Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Sistem Hukum.” Jurnal UKSW, 2013. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id/handle/123456789/8032?show=full.

Black, Donald J. “The Boundaries of Legal Sociology.” The Yale Law Journal, 1972. https://doi.org/10.2307/795221.

Dennis F, DiBari. “Restoring Restitution: The Role Of Proximate Causation In Child Pornography Possession Cases Where Restitution Is Sought.” Cardozo Law Review 33, no. 2 (2018): 268.

Doerner, William G, Steven P. Lam. Victimology. America: Anderson Publishing co, 1988.

Elias, Robert. Community Control, Criminal Justice and Victim Services. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

Friedman, Lawrence M. American Law: An Introduction. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 1984.

Gerth, Hans H. “On Talcott Parsons’The Social System.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 10, no. 4 (June 1997): 673–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02098738.

Hamid, Usman. “Laporan Tahunan LPSK 2020: LPSK Menolak Menyerah, Separuh Napas Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Di Tengah Pandemi.” Jakarta, 2020.

Joanna Shapland, Jon Willmore, Peter Duff. Victim in The Criminal Justice System. Edited by A.E. Bottonms (ed.) Gower Publishing Company Limited, 1985.

Kania, Dede. “Pidana Penjara Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 2014. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11088.

Landau, Simha F., and Robert E. Freeman-Longo. “Classifying Victims: A Proposed Multidimensional Victimological Typology.” International Review of Victimology 1, no. 3 (September 1990): 267–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975809000100304.

Legal Information Institute. “U.S. Code: Title 18,” n.d.

Mukhidin, Mukhidin. “Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterakan Rakyat.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 1, no. 3 (2014).

Muladi & Barda Nawawi Arief. Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1992.

Nuqul, Fathul Lubabin. “Penilaian Keadilan Hukuman Kejahatan Seksual: Tinjauan Dari Latar Belakang Pendidikan Dan Gender.” Sosio-Religia 9 (2010).

Nurhasan, Nurhasan. “Keberadaan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Pada Proses Peradilan Pidana : Kajian.” Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi 17, no. 3 (2017): 205–15. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v17i3.414.

Pasaribu, Edwin Patogi. “Implementation of the Right to Restitution for Victims of Human Trafficking.” the National Consultation Workshop: Strengthening Access to and Implementation of Compensation for Victims of Human Trafficking, organized by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, 2022.

Rai Yuliartini, Ni Putu. “KEDUDUKAN KORBAN KEJAHATAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA (KUHAP).” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 2015. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v1i1.5006.

Schinggyt Tryan, Muhammad P, and Nyoman Serikat Putrajaya. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana.” Diponegoro Law Journal, 2016.

Sukadi, Imam. “Matinya Hukum Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Risalah Hukum 7, no. 1 (2011).

Syamsudin, M. “Faktor-Faktor Sosiolegal Yang Menentukan Dalam Penanganan Perkara Korupsi Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 2010. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss3.art4.

Sykes, Gresham M. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2020.

Tehupeiory, Aartje. Makna Konsinyasi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses, 2017.

V.V. Stanciu. Victim-Producing Civilizations and Situations. Washington DC: Visage Inc., 1976.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2025.11.1.320

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



JURNAL IDEA HUKUM (ISSN Online: 2442-7241 | ISSN Print: 2442-7454) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 

Indexed by:

Crossref logo  DOAJ has had a makeover and we hope you like the result! – DOAJ Blog  Sinta, Scopus ala Indonesia dari Kemenristekdikti – STIE Lhokseumawe